Temporary suspension of Officer Shalom Alvarez
Chief of Police Joseph Chacon determined that Officer Alvarez's acts violated Civil Service Commission Rule 10.03 and suspended him from his duties for one day, from May 26, 2022, to May 26, 2022. An Internal Affairs' investigation revealed that Officer Alvarez violated Civil Service Rules and APD policy when it was determined that he improperly deactivated his in-car camera recording (DMAV) when responding to a hot shot call.
Document
Temporary suspension of Officer Shalom Alvarez780.58 KBPDF Content
Disclaimer: The following text was extracted from the PDF file to make this document more accessible. This machine-generated content may contain styling errors due to redactions. In some instances, text may not load if the original file is a scanned image or has not been made searchable. For the full version of the document, please view the PDF.RECEIVED
Civil Service Office
OF
MAY 1 9 2022
FOUNDED
1839
MEMORANDUM
Austin Police Department
Office of the Chief of Police
TO:
Joya Hayes, Director of Civil Service
FROM:
Joseph Chacon, Chief of Police
DATE:
May 19, 2022
SUBJECT:
Temporary Suspension of Police Officer Shalom Alvarez #9207
Internal Affairs Control Number 2021-1285
Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 143 of the Texas Local Government Code, Section
143.052, and Rule 10, Rules of Procedure for the Firefighters', Police Officers' and
Emergency Medical Service Personnel's Civil Service Commission, I have temporarily
suspended Police Ofc. Shalom Alvarez #9207 from duty as a City of Austin, Texas police
officer for a period of
one
(1) days. The temporary suspension is effective
beginning on May 26, 2022 and continuing through May 26, 2022.
I took this action because Ofc. Alvarez violated Civil Service Commission Rule
10.03,
which sets forth the grounds for disciplinary suspensions of employees in the classified
service, and states:
No employee of the classified service of the City of Austin shall engage in,
or be involved in, any of the following acts or conduct, and the same shall
constitute cause for suspension of an employee from the classified service
of the City:
L.
Violation of any of the rules and regulations of the Fire
Department or Police Department or of special orders, as
applicable.
1
The following are the specific acts committed by Ofc. Alvarez in violation of Rule 10:
On November 24, 2021, Ofc. Shalom Alvarez responded to a Code 3 Hot Shot call1, and
he bypassed or overrode the automatic activation of the Digital Mobile Audio Video
(DMAV) system. At the time of his response, the roads were wet from rain. Ofc. Alvarez
lost control of his patrol car and was involved in a single-vehicle crash in the 500 block of
E. Riverside Drive shortly after bypassing the automatic activation of the DMAV system.
Ofc. Alvarez's patrol unit sustained significant damage to the front right quarter panel.
Ofc. Alvarez advised Internal Affairs (IA) that he violated the following General Orders:
304.3 Digital Mobile Audio Video Recorder Operation
304.3.3 When DMAV Deactivation is Authorized
804.2 General Operation of Department Vehicles
Specifically, Ofc. Alvarez advised IA that on the date of the incident, "I believed DMAV
didn't need to be on until I arrived to the scene, so I didn't see a reason for it to be on and
that is why when- I hit Code 3, camera activated, I just proceeded to turn it off manually
'cause I didn't think that was at the time taking police action. Ofc. Alvarez also admitted
that he failed to operate a department vehicle in a careful and prudent manner under the
circumstances, including wet conditions. He stated that he lost control of the vehicle and
collided with a concrete wall as a result of his actions. Ofc. Alvarez went on to express
remorse and accepted responsibility by stating the following at the end of his IA interview:
"I just wanted to apologize, or recognize that I did mess up, it's an error that I
made, and I just wanted to say I'm sorry to everyone here and my chain of command
and my shift mates, my fellow partners 'cause it kinda took away from the call that
we were going to, which is a gun hotshot, so it took resources away from individuals
or citizens that needed our help to come and help me, which obviously - I was upset
about that and I just wanted to say I was sorry about that, At the time of this
incident, I wasn't aware that DMAV should be on Code 3. But now I've learned
from that mistake and ever since then I always leave my DMAV on.
By these actions, Ofc. Alvarez violated Rule 10.03(L) of the Civil Service Rules by
violating the following rules and regulations of the Austin Police Department:
Austin Police Department Policy 304.3(c): Digital Mobile Audio Video
Recording: Digital Mobile Audio Video Recorder Operation
304.3(c) Digital Mobile Audio Video Recorder Operation
(c)
Employees shall not:
I A Hot Shot call is an incident which is in progress and is an immediate threat to life and/or public safety.
2
1.
Bypass or override the automatic activation of the equipment.
2.
Erase, alter, or delete any recording produced by the DMAV.
Austin Police Department Policy 304.3.3: Digital Mobile Audio Video
Recording: When DMAV Deactivation is Authorized
304.3.3 When DMAV Deactivation is Authorized
(a)
Once the DMAV system is activated it shall remain on until the incident has
concluded.
1.
For purposes of this section, conclusion of an incident has
occurred when:
(a) All arrests have been made and arrestees have been
transported; and
(b) All witnesses and victims have been interviewed.
2.
Recording may cease if an employee is simply waiting for a
tow truck or a family member to arrive, or in other similar
situations where no further law enforcement action is likely
to occur.
(b)
Employees may deactivate the audio portion by engaging the mute
button on the wireless microphone, for administrative reasons only,
as follows:
1.
The reason for the audio deactivation must be recorded
verbally prior to audio deactivation; and
2.
After the purpose for audio deactivation has concluded,
employees will reactivate the audio track.
(c)
For purposes of this section, an "administrative reason" refers to:
1.
Personal conversations unrelated to the incident being
recorded.
2.
Officer to Officer training (e.g., when a Field Training
Officer or Field Training Supervisor wishes to speak to an
officer enrolled in the Field Training Program about a
training issue).
3.
The conclusion of an incident.
4.
Any reason authorized by a supervisor. The identity of the
supervisor granting the authorization shall also be stated
prior to the audio deactivation.
3
Austin Police Department Policy 804.2(a): Department Vehicles: General
Operation of Department Vehicles
804.2(a) General Operation of Department Vehicles
(a)
Employees will operate Department vehicles in a careful and
prudent manner within the guidelines of the law and Department
General Orders. Unsafe or negligent driving is prohibited.
1.
Vehicles will be operated in such a manner and at a rate of
speed that the driver, by use of ordinary care, can avoid
colliding with another vehicle, object, or person.
2.
Employees will wear a seatbelt in the front or back seat while
operating or riding inside of a Department vehicle unless there
is an operational, tactical, or medical need to be unsecured.
By copy of this memo, Ofc. Alvarez is hereby advised of this temporary suspension and
that the suspension may be appealed to the Civil Service Commission by filing with the
Director of Civil Service, within ten (10) days after receipt of a copy of this memo, a proper
notice of appeal in accordance with Section 143.010 of the Texas Local Government Code.
By copy of this memo and as required by Section 143.057 of the Texas Local Government
Code, Ofc. Alvarez is hereby advised that such section and the Agreement Between the
City of Austin and the Austin Police Association provide for an appeal to an independent
third-party hearing examiner, in accordance with the provisions of such Agreement. If
appeal is made to a hearing examiner, all rights of appeal to a District Court are waived,
except as provided by Subsection (j) of Section 143.057 of the Texas Local Government
Code. That section states that the State District Court may hear appeals of an award of a
hearing examiner only on the grounds that the arbitration panel was without jurisdiction or
exceeded its jurisdiction, or that the order was procured by fraud, collusion or other
unlawful means. In order to appeal to a hearing examiner, the original notice of appeal
submitted to the Director of Civil Service must state that appeal is made to a hearing
examiner.
In addition, if this disciplinary suspension is for three (3) days or less, Ofc. Alvarez is
advised of the following provisions of Article 18, Section 1, of the Meet and Confer
Agreement:
The parties agree that when an officer is suspended for 1, 2, or 3 days the officer may
choose one of two methods of dealing with the suspensions as listed below.
a)
Suspensions that may not be appealed. The officer may choose to use
vacation or holiday time to serve the suspension with no loss of paid
salary and no break in service for purposes of seniority, retirement,
4
promotion, or any other purpose. The officer must agree that there is no
right to appeal if this method of suspension is chosen.
b)
Suspensions that may be appealed. The officer may appeal the
suspension to arbitration or the Civil Service Commission. If the officer
chooses to appeal the suspension, the arbitrator or Civil Service
Commission's authority is limited to ruling on whether or not the charges
against the officer are true or not true. If the arbitrator or Civil Service
Commission finds the charges to be true, there is no authority to mitigate
the punishment. If the arbitrator or Civil Service Commission finds the
charges to be not true, the officer shall be fully reinstated with no loss of
pay or benefit.
Arbitration Costs on Appealable Suspensions
In the event that an officer appeals a 1, 2, or 3 day suspension to arbitration, it is agreed
that the party that loses the arbitration shall be responsible for all costs of the arbitrator,
including travel and lodging if necessary.
To facilitate such payment on the part of the officer he shall submit, at the time of appeal,
a signed payroll deduction agreement that if the arbitrator rules in favor of the City he
authorizes up to one hundred dollars ($100.00) per month to be deducted from his regular
pay until such time as what would usually be the City's portion of the arbitrator's costs
have been satisfied.
John CHACON, Chief Phacon Chief of Police
5/19/2022
JOSEPH
Date
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
I hereby acknowledge receipt of the above and foregoing memorandum of temporary
suspension, and I have been advised that if I desire to appeal that I have ten (10) calendar
days from the date of this receipt to file written notice of appeal with the Director of Civil
Service in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 143 of the Texas Local Government
Code.
alamy #9207
05/19/2022
Police Officer Shalom Alvarez #9207
Date
5