Formal complaint: Purpose and scope and other policy violations
Complainant alleges that due to a clerical error by the DMV, she was pulled over by APD officers for stolen license plates. Even though she cooperated, the officers that pulled her over pointed guns at her, handcuffed her, and failed to read her Miranda Rights. The OPO recommends that this allegation receive an A classification.
Document
Formal complaint: Purpose and scope and other policy violations953.05 KBPDF Content
Disclaimer: The following text was extracted from the PDF file to make this document more accessible. This machine-generated content may contain styling errors due to redactions. In some instances, text may not load if the original file is a scanned image or has not been made searchable. For the full version of the document, please view the PDF.OF
GIVE
OFFICE OF
NOTICE OF FORMAL
POLICE OVERSIGHT
COMPLAINT
ICMS #: 2020-0222
May 7, 2020
Complaint: Ms.
complainant, alleges that Austin Police Department (APD)
officers may have violated APD policy after pulling her over when their license plate readers
showed that the vehicle she was driving was stolen. Ms.
alleges that she was told to walk
backward toward the officers and when she was allowed to turn her head to see, she noticed that
they were pointing guns at her. Ms.
states that she was terrified and didn't know what
she had done, and that officers put her hands behind her back and put her in handcuffs, and that
one officer told her, "Well, clearly this isn't a routine traffic stop." Ms.
states that she is
doesn't understand why her plates would have come up as being stolen because they were new
plates from the DMV, and that she was told by police later during this incident that the issue was
due to a clerical error on the part of the DMV. Ms.
also alleges that Miranda rights
weren't read to her. Ms.
states that her frustration was with the manner in which police
pulled her over; she states that she doesn't think that it's appropriate to put guns on people who
are cooperating, and that if a minor clerical error puts citizens at risk of being shot by police
officers, that's problematic, and it's also problematic to use that level of force because she
doesn't think that is keeping people safe.
This notice of formal complaint is a request for Internal Affairs to initiate an investigation in
order to determine if the employee conduct is within compliance of APD policy, Civil Service
Rules, and Municipal Civil Service Rules.
Recommended Administrative Policies to Review (to include but not limited to):
301.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
All persons deserve protection by fair and impartial law enforcement and should be able to
expect similar police response to their behavior wherever it occurs. Employees will serve the
public through direction, counseling, assistance, and protection of life and property. Employees
will be held accountable for the manner in which they exercise the authority of their office or
position. Employees will respect the rights of individuals and perform their services with
honesty, sincerity, courage, and sound judgment.
301.2 IMPARTIAL ATTITUDE AND COURTESY
Employees are expected to act professionally, treat all persons fairly and equally, and perform
all duties impartially, objectively, and equitably without regard to personal feelings, animosities,
friendships, financial status, sex, creed, color, race, religion, age, political beliefs, sexual
orientation, gender identity or gender expression or social or ethnic background.
304.3.2 WHEN DMAV USE IS REQUIRED
This order is not intended to describe every possible situation where the system may be used.
In some circumstances it is not possible to capture images of the incident due to conditions or
location of the camera however the audio portion can be valuable evidence and is subject to the
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF
CITY
OFFICE OF
NOTICE OF FORMAL
POLICE OVERSIGHT
COMPLAINT
FOUNDED
same activation requirements.
318.5.1 MIRANDA WARNING
(a) Officers will administer the Miranda Warning to a subject during a custodial interview/
interrogation when questioning begins to focus on the person stopped, becoming
accusatory regarding a specific offense.
402.5 REPORTING THE ACTIVE TARGETING OF A FIREARM AT A PERSON
By the nature of their duties, officers may be required by general orders and training to point
their firearm, including impact munitions, and actively target at a person. This section does not
create an additional requirement for officers to initiate an incident report; however, officers that
actively target their firearm at a person shall properly document the incident as outlined below.
900.1.1 RESPONSIBILITY TO KNOW AND COMPLY
The rules of conduct set forth in this order do not serve as an all-inclusive list of requirements,
limitations, or prohibitions on employee conduct and activities; employees are required to know
and comply with all Department policies, procedures, and written directives.
Recommended Classification: The OPO is permitted to make a preliminary recommendation
on the classification of administrative cases.
The OPO recommends that this allegation receive an A classification.
1839
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.