Formal Complaint: OPO declines to make a recommendation
Complainant alleges that an Austin police officer made a gesture associated with racial intolerance while on duty at a protest. The Office of Police Oversight declines to make a recommendation.
Document
Formal Complaint: OPO declines to make a recommendation498.67 KBPDF Content
Disclaimer: The following text was extracted from the PDF file to make this document more accessible. This machine-generated content may contain styling errors due to redactions. In some instances, text may not load if the original file is a scanned image or has not been made searchable. For the full version of the document, please view the PDF.OF
CITY
TERMS
OFFICE OF
NOTICE OF FORMAL
POLICE OVERSIGHT
COMPLAINT
ICMS #: 2020-1611
November 9, 2020
Complaint: I want to report a very disturbing incident which took place at the
on
at
This is separate from the disruption of the march
by Proud Boys, assorted other white supremacists, and Trump supporters, and from APD"s
inaction in the face of sexual and physical assaults by those white supremacists. The incident
happened after almost everybody has disbanded. I was leaving the march. I left the East park at
the East steps leading up to the street. I passed an officer sitting in his patrol car, an SUV black-
and-white. The vehicle was
about 150 feet
I looked at him and gave him a thumbs-up, thinking I'll thank him for being
there. He flashed me the "OK" sign. I didn't' think anything of it until later when I was looking at
some pics of the march and saw that sign flashed by the white supremacists. At that point, I realized
that the officer was not signaling "OK", but "White Power!" I did not have the presence of mind
to recognize the sign for what it was and to challenge it immediately. I wish I noted his patrol car's
identifier. I am almost certain that there was only one squad car at the scene at that time. If APD
squad cars have GPS tracking of its location, that will put the vehicle and the officer driving it at
that point, at the scene. My Google Timeline record puts me at the scene as well. So it will come
down to whether or not the officer made the "W.P." white supremacist sign or not. I know that it
will be my word only as to what happened, but I know what I saw. As an Austinite, it is my duty
to call it out. What is more dangerous than a militarized police department is a militarized police
department that harbors brazen white supremacist officers. Austin deserves far better. It is
unacceptable that APD includes white supremacists in its ranks. It is doubly unacceptable that
APD includes white supremacists brazen enough to flash a "White Power!" sign to a woman who
was obviously a
participant, carrying a bullhorn and wearing a dress in
transgender pride colors. I am reporting it here, and informing three Austin City Councilpersons,
multiple news outlets, and several civil rights organizations, I request that this incident be
investigated.
This notice of formal complaint is a request for Internal Affairs to initiate an investigation in
order to determine if the employee conduct is within compliance of APD policy, Civil Service
Rules, and Municipal Civil Service Rules.
Recommended Administrative Policies to Review (to include but not limited to):
105.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE COMMUNITY POLICING
The purpose of this general order is to identify the tenets of Community Policing, which serves
as the basis for this Department's mission and guiding principles. Community Policing is
beyond a philosophy, it is a practice. The Austin Police Department is committed to
Community Policing which strives to build mutual respect, collaborative partnerships, fair and
impartial policing, and procedurally just behavior with the community that we serve. The
Department's goal is to have an understanding of the traditions, culture, and history of the
neighborhoods in which they serve in order to develop proactive solutions to problems and
increase overall trust in policing.
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF
GINT
OFFICE OF
NOTICE OF FORMAL
POLICE OVERSIGHT
COMPLAINT
FOUNDED
300.3 CROWDS, EVENTS AND GATHERINGS
Officers may encounter gatherings of people, including but not limited to, civil
demonstrations, civic, social and business events, public displays, parades and sporting
events. Officers should monitor such events as time permits in an effort to keep the peace and
protect the safety and rights of those present. A patrol supervisor should be notified when it
becomes reasonably foreseeable that such an event may require increased monitoring, contact
or intervention.
301.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE - RESPONSIBILITY TO THE COMMUNITY
All persons deserve protection by fair and impartial law enforcement and should be able to
expect similar police response to their behavior wherever it occurs. Employees will serve the
public through direction, counseling, assistance, and protection of life and property. Employees
will be held accountable for the manner in which they exercise the authority of their office or
position. Employees will respect the rights of individuals and perform their services with
honesty, sincerity, courage, and sound judgment.
301.2 IMPARTIAL ATTITUDE AND COURTESY
Employees are expected to act professionally, treat all persons fairly and equally, and perform
all duties impartially, objectively, and equitably without regard to personal feelings,
animosities, friendships, financial status, sex, creed, color, race, religion, age, political beliefs,
sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression or social or ethnic background.
Recommended Classification: The OPO is permitted to make a preliminary recommendation
on the classification of administrative cases.
The OPO declines to make a classification recommendation.
1839
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.