Formal complaint: De-escalation of potential force encounters and other policy violations
The complainant alleges that an Austin police officer failed to respond to a scene when the complainant told the officer about an injured individual and in need of help. OPO recommends this complaint receive a B classification.
PDF Content
Disclaimer: The following text was extracted from the PDF file to make this document more accessible. This machine-generated content may contain styling errors due to redactions. In some instances, text may not load if the original file is a scanned image or has not been made searchable. For the full version of the document, please view the PDF.CITY OF
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
NOTICE OF FORMAL COMPLAINT
ICMS #: 2021-1192
December 15, 2021
Complaint: The complainant alleges: there was an individual bleeding from chest area. He noticed
an EMS vehicle at corner of
and there was an officer standing near the EMS
vehicle. When he approached the EMS vehicle to tell them there was a person needing assistance,
officer
told him to go away, leave us alone, we are not here for that. When he told officer
how he felt about being waved off, officer
then noticed the individual on the ground,
then EMS responded and cornered off the area. After the individual was loaded into the EMS
vehicle, he went over and asked Ofc.
for his badge number. Officer
provided badge
number
Officer
then asked him if he witness it; he stated he was the individual that
was told to go away. Officer
immediate response was get the fuck away. Officer
put his hands on him and pushed him back a couple of times.
This notice of formal complaint is a request for Internal Affairs to initiate an investigation to
determine if the employee conduct is within compliance of APD policy, Civil Service Rules, and
Municipal Civil Service Rules.
Recommended Administrative Policies to Review (to include but not limited to):
200.2 DE-ESCALATION OF POTENTIAL FORCE ENCOUNTERS
When safe and reasonable under the totality of circumstances, officers shall use de-escalation
techniques to reduce the likelihood for force and increase the likelihood of voluntary compliance.
Nothing in this de-escalation policy requires an officer to place themselves in harm's way to
attempt to de-escalate a situation. Recognizing that circumstances may rapidly change, officers
may need to abandon de-escalation efforts after they have commenced. Understanding that no
policy can realistically predict every situation an officer might encounter, the Department
recognizes that each officer must be entrusted with well-reasoned discretion in determining the
reasonable de escalation techniques to use in a situation. This de-escalation policy is intended to
complement, not replace or supersede, other portions of the APD Policy Manual or specific officer
training that addresses de-escalation.
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to
communications will be provided upon request.
OF
CITY
LUSTAN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
NOTICE OF FORMAL COMPLAINT
200.2.1 ASSESSMENT AND DE-ESCALATION
As officers arrive on the scene, observe conditions, and interact with the persons there, they
should continue to gather additional relevant information and facts. These assessments, along
with reasonable inferences help to develop an understanding of the totality of the circumstances
of the incident.
200.3 RESPONSE TO RESISTANCE
If it is not already reasonably known by the subject to be searched or arrested, or it is not
reasonably impracticable to do so, officers should make clear their intent to arrest or search and
identify themselves as a peace officer before using force.
200.3.1 DETERMINING THE OBJECTIVE REASONABLENESS OF FORCE
Any interpretation of objective reasonableness about the amount of force that reasonably appears
to be necessary in a particular situation must allow for the fact that police officers are often
forced to make split-second decisions in circumstances that are tense, uncertain and rapidly
evolving, and the amount of time available to evaluate and respond to changing circumstances
may influence their decisions. The question is whether the officer's actions are "objectively
reasonable" in light of the facts and circumstances confronting them.
301.1 IMPARTIAL ATTITUDE AND COURTESY
Employees shall provide equal and fair protection of all rights under local, state, and federal law
for all members of the community. Law enforcement will be conducted in an impartial and
equitable manner.
Recommended Classification: The OPO is permitted to make a preliminary recommendation on
the classification of administrative cases.
The OPO recommends this complaint receive a B classification
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to
communications will be provided upon request.