Queja formal: Insubordinación, Factores para considerar antes de iniciar una búsqueda, y otras violaciones a políticas

OF
CITY
AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
NOTICE OF FORMAL
POLICE OVERSIGHT
COMPLAINT
ICMS #: 2021-0163
March 12, 2021
Complaint: The complainant,
alleges: I am making this complaint due to an
incident that happened on
at or around
myself being one of the victims in this
crime as well as my boyfriend we had been leaving the
when trying to exit an Austin Police officer came zooming in with his lights already on us not
knowing what was going on we had never been spoken or addressed to by the officer not once did
he say anything not even on his intercom SO as we assumed we had been in his way SO we tried to
move and that's when I feared for my life the cop then starts ramming his vehicle into my car at
one point I try and get out and he rams into the vehicle passenger side where I could have been
seriously injured and not knowing what is the reason behind this madness SO at that point we then
did the only thing we could do not wanting to deal with this crazed officer in fear for our lives we
then had to run through a fence fleeing the scene but after all this the officer did not pursue us
never did we see backup of any kind but being that this is involving a police officer made the
whole situation different SO now my vehicle is damaged pretty bad not knowing how to go about
dealing with this I contacted my attorney and was told to contact yall to make this complaint and
then we would go from there.
This notice of formal complaint is a request for Internal Affairs to initiate an investigation in
order to determine if the employee conduct is within compliance of APD policy, Civil Service
Rules, and Municipal Civil Service Rules.
Recommended Administrative Policies to Review (to include but not limited to):
110.4.4 INSUBORDINATION
Employees will not be insubordinate. The willful disobedience of, or deliberate refusal to obey
any lawful order of a supervisor is insubordination. Defying the authority of any supervisor by
obvious disrespect, arrogant or disrespectful conduct, ridicule, or challenge to orders issued is
considered insubordination whether done in or out of the supervisor's presence.
214.3.2 FACTORS TO CONSIDER BEFORE INITIATING A PURSUIT
With the exception of the specified restrictions on vehicle pursuits listed in this order, officers
are authorized to initiate a pursuit when it is reasonable to believe that a subject is attempting to
evade arrest or detention by fleeing in a vehicle.
214.3.3 WHEN TO TERMINATE A PURSUIT
Pursuits should be discontinued whenever the totality of objective circumstances known, or
which reasonably ought to be known, to the officer or supervisor during the pursuit indicates that
the present risks of continuing the pursuit reasonably appear to outweigh the risks resulting from
the subject's escape. Officers and supervisors must objectively and continuously weigh the
seriousness of the offense against the potential danger to motorists, themselves, and the public
when electing to continue a pursuit. This section shall not be construed to authorize a pursuit that
is expressly prohibited as outlined in the Restrictions on Vehicle Pursuits section of this order.
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF
CITY
AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
NOTICE OF FORMAL
POLICE OVERSIGHT
COMPLAINT
FOUNDED
(a) The factors listed in this order on when to initiate a pursuit are expressly included herein and
shall also apply to the decision to discontinue a pursuit. In addition to those factors listed, the
following should also be considered in deciding whether to terminate a pursuit:
4. Hazards to uninvolved bystanders or motorists.
214.3.4 PURSUIT DRIVING CONSIDERATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS
The decision to use specific driving tactics requires the same assessment of factors to be
considered concerning pursuit initiation and termination. The following driving tactics apply to
units involved in a pursuit:
(a) Officers will space themselves from other involved vehicles, in consideration of their driving
skills and vehicle performance capabilities, SO they are able to see and avoid hazards or react
safely to maneuvers by the fleeing vehicle and other police units.
214.6.4 LOW SPEED INTERVENTION
Other than an approved usage of PIT, police vehicles shall not be used to physically force a
pursued vehicle off the roadway or to a stop, or to otherwise change its direction of travel or alter
its speed unless:
(a) The pursued vehicle is at a stop or near stop; and
(b) The police vehicle is maneuvering at low speed; and
(c) Doing SO would reduce or eliminate the risk associated with the pursuit continuing.
Before engaging in such actions, officers must consider the unintended consequences of the low
speed intervention and recognize that a better course of action may be to terminate the pursuit
altogether.
303.3.1 WHEN DEPARTMENT ISSUED BWC SYSTEM USE IS REQUIRED
This section is not intended to describe every possible situation where the system may be used.
In some circumstances it may not be possible to capture images of an incident due to conditions
or location of the camera, however the audio portion can be valuable evidence and is subject to
the same activation requirements. The BWC should only be activated for law enforcement
purposes.
301.1 RESPONSIBILITY TO COMMUNITY - PURPOSE AND SCOPE
All persons deserve protection by fair and impartial law enforcement and should be able to
expect similar police response to their behavior wherever it occurs. Employees will serve the
public through direction, counseling, assistance, and protection of life and property. Employees
will be held accountable for the manner in which they exercise the authority of their office or
position. Employees will respect the rights of individuals and perform their services with
honesty, sincerity, courage, and sound judgment.
402.2 INCIDENT REPORTING
A well-written report can help make a case just as easily as a poorly written report can ruin a case.
Employees have the responsibility to write clear, factual, and complete reports.
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF
CITY
ADSPIT
OFFICE OF
NOTICE OF FORMAL
POLICE OVERSIGHT
COMPLAINT
FOUNDED
1839
Recommended Classification: The OPO is permitted to make a preliminary recommendation
on the classification of administrative cases.
The OPO recommends that this allegation receive an A classification.
OUNDED
1839
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.