Comentarios de la comunidad y recomendaciones finales: Restricción de disparar a vehículos en movimiento

Restrict Shooting at Moving Vehicles
Research shows that shooting at moving vehicles is a dangerous and ineffective tactic with a high
16
risk of injuring bystanders. Campaign Zero's 8 Can't Wait initiative recommends that police
17
departments restrict the circumstances under which officers may shoot at moving vehicles.
In
Resolution 95, the Austin City Council said it was the official policy of the City that "[u]se of
deadly force against individuals, including persons fleeing (in vehicle or on foot), shall be limited
to
situations where necessary for self-defense or defense of others against an imminent deadly threat
or threat of serious bodily injury, and either there were no other reasonable alternatives to prevent
18
serious injury, or death or all reasonable alternatives have been exhausted."
APD's current policy is silent on the issue of shooting from moving vehicles and does not sufficiently
19
restrict shooting at moving vehicles. Increasing restrictions on shooting at moving vehicles has
20
been shown to contribute to a reduction in officer-involved shootings.
Click here for OPO's Phase I analysis of this policy topic.
Analysis of community feedback on restricting shooting at moving vehicles
Quantitative Data
51% of respondents reported that they felt safe with the current policy on shooting at moving
vehicles
56% of respondents disagreed that, under all circumstances, shooting at moving vehicles should
be prohibited
47% of respondents agreed that officers should be prohibited from the act of shooting while
driving or riding in a moving vehicle, while another 47% disagreed
Qualitative Data
Over half of respondents supported the current policy for shooting at moving vehicles, and believe it
should be allowed when necessary. Some respondents support shooting at moving vehicles because
they believe an officer is adequately trained on this action; however, APD officers are not trained in
this area. 21
Those who expressed support for restricting shooting at moving vehicles reasoned that it can be
inaccurate and unsafe due to the additional variables created by a vehicle in motion. Additionally,
community members expressed concern that a moving vehicle could be perceived as a threat when,
in fact, there was no threat. For example, an officer may perceive a vehicle in motion as a threat,
even if it is driving away from officers and bystanders. Further, those who supported OPO's policy
changes responded that there should be more guidelines within this policy, and that shooting at
Office of Police Oversight
Restrict Shooting at Moving Vehicles
moving vehicles should be restricted except for instances when a vehicle poses immediate, life-
threatening danger.
Those who responded that no change was needed reasoned that a car could be used as a weapon
and that situations happen too quickly to restrict officers. Additionally, those not in support of OPO's
proposed changes responded that the policy change was too restrictive and that a vehicle used as a
weapon could directly impact an officer's safety.
Below are selected comments from community feedback:
"
"Re: shooting at moving vehicles, Lexipol policy manual states shots fired at
and from a moving vehicle are rarely effective. Behavioral change must be
more effective."
"The only reason to shoot at a vehicle is if the vehicle is moving towards the
officer and they should only be able to shoot at the tires to stop the vehicle
from moving. If the officer feels someone's life is in danger inside the vehicle
and the vehicle is moving away from the officer they should be able to shoot
the tires. If my child was in a car with a kidnapper and an officer was there |
would want them to stop the car. If the car is moving away from the officer,
shoot the tires, if the car is moving towards the officer they should be able to
shoot the tires. Shooting at tires is the best thing."
"I suggest that officers can only shoot at a moving vehicle only to disable the
vehicle and not to shoot at occupants of the vehicle."
of Police Oversight
Restrict Shooting at Moving Vehicles
Recommendations from community feedback
Adopt OPO's amended recommendations
22
OPO's preliminary review of APD's policy on shooting at moving vehicles highlighted two concerns:
Shooting at moving vehicles was not sufficiently restricted
The policy was silent on the topic of shooting from moving vehicles
While the majority of community members supported APD's existing policies, many community
members' responses demonstrated misunderstandings as to the effectiveness of the tactics and the
current training offered to APD officers.
In its Phase I report, OPO made a series of recommendations to improve APD's policies, particularly
considering the fact that APD does not train officers to shoot at or from moving vehicles.
The table below compares APD's current policies and OPO's proposed recommendations with Austin
City Council Resolution 95, 8 Can't Wait, and best practices from leading police organizations.
Table 1. Comparing OPO's Proposed Recommendations and APD's Current Policy on Shooting at
Moving Vehicles
OPO's Proposed Recommendations
APD's Current Policy
Aligns with information from:
Aligns with information from:
27
YES Police Executive Research Forum 23
NO Police Executive Research Forum
YES International Association of Chiefs
NO International Association of Chiefs
28
24
of Police
of Police
29
!
8 Can't Wait* 25
NO 8 Can't Wait
26
YES Austin City Council Resolution 95
NO Austin City Council
Resolution 95 30
*Model policies for Campaign Zero's 8 Can't Wait initiative do not address mass casualty incidents.
Office of Police Oversight
Restrict Shooting at Moving Vehicles
Since OPO made preliminary recommendations in January 2021, there have not been any updated
best practices contradicting this information. In fact, in June 2021, the Police Executive Research
Forum published a statement doubling down on its position, which aligns with OPO's
recommendations. The Police Executive Research Forum is a non-profit police research and policy
organization that informs policy and training at law enforcement agencies nationwide, including
31
APD. In particular, the Police Executive Research Forum recommends that "[a]gencies should
adopt a prohibition against shooting at or from a moving vehicle unless someone in the vehicle is
32
using or threatening deadly force by means other than the vehicle itself."
OPO has analyzed the community's feedback. OPO has also considered current best practices,
including the consensus among experts that shooting at or from moving vehicles is dangerous and
33
rarely effective even when officers are trained. After examining all of this information, OPO
recommends that APD adopt OPO's preliminary recommendations with the following amendment:
Table 2. OPO's Preliminary and Amended Recommendation to APD's Policy on Shooting at Moving Vehicles
OPO's Preliminary Recommendation
OPO's Amended Recommendation
GO 202.1.3(a)(1)
GO 200.1.2 and GO 202.1.3(a)(1)
202.1.3 MOVING VEHICLES
200.1.2 DEFINITIONS
(a) Officers shall only discharge their
Totality of the Circumstances- The facts and
firearms at a moving vehicle if, based on
information known to the officer at the time
the totality of the circumstances, they
of the incident, which serve as the basis for
have exhausted all possible alternatives
the officer's decision to use force.
and:
202.1.3 MOVING VEHICLES
1. an occupant of the vehicle is using
(a) Officers shall only discharge their
deadly force by means other than the
firearms at a moving vehicle if, based on
vehicle itself
the totality of the circumstances, they
have exhausted all possible alternatives
and:
1. an occupant of the vehicle is using or
immediately threatening deadly force by
means other than the vehicle itself
NOTE: New OPO recommendations are shown in bold, underlined text.
Click here for more information about OPO's preliminary recommendation.
Office of Police Oversight
Restrict Shooting at Moving Vehicles
OPO's recommendations incorporate community feedback and/or the City of Austin's official
position by:
34
Not categorically prohibiting an officer from shooting at a moving vehicle
Restricting the circumstances under which shooting at a moving vehicle would be permissible,
including by:
35
Requiring officers to exhaust all alternatives before shooting
Requiring that the driver, or an occupant, of the vehicle be using the use of deadly force, or
36
immediately threatening deadly force, by means other than the vehicle itself
Adding more guidelines
OPO's recommendations incorporate guidance from law enforcement research and policy
organizations by:
37
Not categorically prohibiting an officer from shooting at a moving vehicle"
Restricting the circumstances under which it would be permissible by:
Requiring that the driver, or an occupant, of the vehicle be using deadly force, or
immediately threatening deadly force, by means other than the vehicle itself³8
Accounting for situations in which the vehicle itself is being used as a weapon that will more
39
likely than not result in mass casualties (e.g., ramming a car into a crowd of protesters)
40
Creating a duty for officers to move out of the way of a moving vehicle
41
Eliminating vague terms
Prohibiting shooting from moving vehicles based on the increased likelihood of risk to innocent
42
bystanders and the lack of training of APD officers
Office of Police Oversight