Queja formal: Cuando se requiere el uso del sistema de cámara corporal distribuido por el departamento y otras violaciones a políticas
El querellante alega que fue sacado por la fuerza de su carro, dado una multa por razones incorrectas, y recibió metraje de la cámara corporal de manera incompleto. La Oficina de Fiscalización de la Policía recomienda que esta alegación reciba una clasificación B.
Contenido del documento
Aviso: El siguiente texto fue extraído de un documento PDF para hacerlo más accesible. Este contenido generado por máquina puede contener errores de formato. El texto se mostrará en el idioma original del documento. En algunos casos, el texto no se cargará si el documento original es una imagen escaneada o si el texto no tiene capacidad de búsqueda. Para mirar la versión completa, favor de ver el documento PDF.OF
CHIP
OFFICE OF
NOTICE OF FORMAL
POLICE OVERSIGHT
COMPLAINT
FOUNDED
ICMS #: 2021-0196
March 12, 2021
Complaint: Complainant alleges being forcefully removed from his car following a traffic stop
after Officer
became aware that
had a gun in the car.
Complainant alleges the officer was rude to him and felt like the he was coming up with reasons
to give him citations. Complainant has requested BWC footage but received incomplete footage.
Complainant would like to know if there was a use of force report filed. Complainant alleges
reasons for the ticket given were incorrect.
This notice of. formal complaint is a request for Internal Affairs to initiate an investigation in
order to determine if the employee conduct is within compliance of APD policy, Civil Service
Rules, and Municipal Civil Service Rules.
Recommended Administrative Policies to Review (to include but not limited to):
303.3.1 WHEN DEPARTMENT ISSUED BWC SYSTEM USE IS REQUIRED
This section is not intended to describe every possible situation where the system may be used.
In some circumstances it may not be possible to capture images of an incident due to conditions
or location of the camera, however the audio portion can be valuable evidence and is subject to
the same activation requirements. The BWC should only be activated for law enforcement
purposes.
(a) All units responding to a scene shall activate their department issued BWC equipment
when they: 1. Arrive on-scene to any call for service.
(b) Examples of when the department issued BWC system must be activated include, but
are not limited to:
1. Traffic stops.
(e) There may be instances in which an employee is required to take immediate action in
response to an event which may not allow time to activate their BWC. In those situations,
it may be impractical or unreasonable for employees to activate their BWC system before
taking police action. It is expected that once the immediacy of the situation is over,
employees will activate their BWC system to record the remainder of the incident.
Employees shall articulate the reasoning for the delayed activation of their BWC in an
offense report, supplement, or other form of Department approved documentation.
304.3.2 WHEN DMAV USE IS REQUIRED
This order is not intended to describe every possible situation where the system may be used. In
some circumstances it is not possible to capture images of the incident due to conditions or
location of the camera however the audio portion can be valuable evidence and is subject to the
same activation requirements.
(a) All units responding to a scene shall activate their DMAV equipment when they:
1. Arrive on-scene to any call for service
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF
CITY
STEPHEN
OFFICE OF
NOTICE OF FORMAL
POLICE OVERSIGHT
COMPLAINT
FOUNDED
(b) Examples of when the DMAV system must be activated include, but are not limited
to:
1. Traffic stops.
200.2.1 ASSESSMENT AND DE-ESCALATION
As officers arrive on the scene, observe conditions, and interact with the persons there, they
should continue to gather additional relevant information and facts. These assessments, along
with reasonable inferences help to develop an understanding of the totality of the circumstances
of the incident.
200.5 REPORTING THE RESPONSE TO RESISTANCE
Any response to resistance by a member of this department shall be documented promptly,
completely and accurately in an appropriate report as prescribed by General Order 211
(Response to Resistance Inquiry, Reporting, and Review).
200.5.1 NOTIFICATION TO SUPERVISORS
Supervisor notification shall be made as soon as practicable following any force incident or
allegation of force.
301.2 IMPARTIAL ATTITUDE AND COURTESY
Employees are expected to act professionally, treat all persons fairly and equally, and perform all
duties impartially, objectively, and equitably without regard to personal feelings, animosities,
friendships, financial status, sex, creed, color, race, religion, age, political beliefs, sexual
orientation, gender identity or gender expression or social or ethnic background.
(c) Employees will make every effort to be courteous and respectful toward all persons.
Recommended Classification: The OPO is permitted to make a preliminary recommendation
on the classification of administrative cases.
The OPO recommends that this allegation receive a B classification.
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.