Queja formal: Actitud imparcial y cortesía
El querellante alega que un detective del Departamento de Policía de Austin no manejó su caso debidamente, y no se comunicó con el querellante para darle seguimiento e informarle el estado del caso. La OPO recomienda que esta alegación reciba una clasificación B.
Document
Queja formal: Actitud imparcial y cortesía211.75 KBContenido del documento
Aviso: El siguiente texto fue extraído de un documento PDF para hacerlo más accesible. Este contenido generado por máquina puede contener errores de formato. El texto se mostrará en el idioma original del documento. En algunos casos, el texto no se cargará si el documento original es una imagen escaneada o si el texto no tiene capacidad de búsqueda. Para mirar la versión completa, favor de ver el documento PDF.OF
DATE
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
NOTICE OF FORMAL COMPLAINT
ICMS #: 2021-0608
June 22, 2021
Complaint: The complainant alleges: Detective
closed the investigation where the
complainant was a victim of an assault. The detective failed to reach out to him prior to closing
the case. After the fact, the complainant spoke with Detective
to follow up on his
investigation and wanted a reason why he was never contacted to gather further details. He was
not allowed to make another report, the Detective spent 48 minutes on the phone trying to dissuade
him. He was told to ignore the suspect, there is no point in doing it, and to get on with his life.
Detective
also told him that they wouldn't be able to get a conviction and he was told he
needed witnesses. The complainant brought forth names of witnesses and was told it was hearsay.
The complainant provided video footage and was told that it didn't count as assault and the footage
can't be more than 1 year old. He was also told by the Detective that they don't want to waste
resources on him. Lastly, he spoke with Lt.
to bring up all the things that were done
incorrectly on his case. Lt.
became aggressive with the complainant, she stated she stands by
her guys and told him it was sufficient for the Detective to have spoken to him.
This notice of. formal complaint is a request for Internal Affairs to initiate an investigation to
determine if the employee conduct is within compliance of APD policy, Civil Service Rules, and
Municipal Civil Service Rules.
Recommended Administrative Policies to Review (to include but not limited to):
301.2 IMPARTIAL ATTITUDE AND COURTESY
Employees shall provide equal and fair protection of all rights under local, state, and federal law
for all members of the community. Law enforcement will be conducted in an impartial and
equitable manner. In an effort to create an organizational culture that is inclusive and
nondiscriminatory, employees shall act professionally, treat all persons fairly and equally, and
strive to interact with the community in a positive manner. Employees will perform all duties
objectively and without regard to personal feelings, animosities, friendships, financial status,
occupation or employment status, sex, disability status, housing status, mental health or ability,
citizenship, language, national origin, creed, color, race, religion, age, political beliefs, sexual
orientation, gender identity, gender expression, ethnicity, or social or ethnic background
Employees will endeavor to understand and respect cultural, national, racial, religious, physical,
mental, and other differences.
Recommended Classification: The OPO is permitted to make a preliminary recommendation on
the classification of administrative cases.
The OPO recommends this complaint receive a B classification.
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to
communications will be provided upon request.