Aviso de queja relacionada con 2022-0597

OF
CUSTOM
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
NOTICE OF COMPLAINT
July 22, 2022
ICMS #: 2022-0597
On July 18, 2022, the OPO received a mail complaint.
The complainant alleges: The complainant sent a 6 page handwritten complaint. The
complaint is against Det.
. The complainant alleges that he tentatively
agreed to meet Det.
at the station to discuss a sexual assault (for which the
complainant was arrested at a later date). The complainant then gives reasons why he was
unable to keep that appointment and reasons why he and
did not reach each
other by phone. On page 4, the complainant enumerates his complaints against
The complainant refers to himself as the "Affiant." The complaint in its entirety can be
found in the case file. The complainant writes:
Affiant will show how the blatant bias, selective investigatory process, and racial profiling
was navigated.
1. He failed to follow up in person as to know factually if the calls he made were received,
by Affiant.
2. He did not investigate to conclude the occupancy of the alleged incident location was
actually subleased by a family on the day of the alleged incident.
.
3. He did not interview or question neighbors, potential witnesses, the fiance or anyone
living in the immediate area, other than the accuser and complainant.
4. He failed to consider or challenge the alleged victims drug use by ordering test for all
concerned.
5. He refused to return for a follow up interview with the affiant in order to discover real
truth.
6. He failed to recognize the conflicting statements and blatent contradictions written and
sworn to in the accuser, affiant, complainant, Affidavit as Report #
.
7. He failed to promote justice by submitting fiction, and absolute proven lies before
reasonably exhausting "ALL" remedies.
CITY OF LEARNE
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
NOTICE OF COMPLAINT
8. Report #
states that the accuser underwent non-acute sexual exam, but failed
to produce any results that would show evidence from his partial investigation.
9. His personal bias, and racist beliefs coupled with his sham of investigatory ability to
rush into judgment, to prosecute without probable cause, shows that he didn't consider true
justice but only the arrest of an African American. More importantly, a lawful complete
and righteous investigation would have resulted in no arrest, nor unlawful confinement.
10. He failed to investigate into an APD Police missing persons report that proves affiant
was found at a
and verified to have been there by officials from
until
. Which would have proven to the racist detective that
the affiant was "NOT" in FACT on the premises of
on
, the reported day of the alleged incident.
This notice of complaint is a request for Internal Affairs to initiate an investigation to
determine if the employee conduct is within compliance of APD policy, Civil Service
Rules, and Municipal Civil Service Rules.