Formal complaint: Purpose and scope and other policy violations
Complainant alleges Austin police officers failed to de-escalate a situation involving an unsatisfied customer and treated the complainant poorly. OPO recommends this complaint receive a B classification.
Document
Formal complaint: Purpose and scope and other policy violations273.91 KBPDF Content
Disclaimer: The following text was extracted from the PDF file to make this document more accessible. This machine-generated content may contain styling errors due to redactions. In some instances, text may not load if the original file is a scanned image or has not been made searchable. For the full version of the document, please view the PDF.OF
CITY
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
NOTICE OF FORMAL COMPLAINT
ICMS #: 2021-1053
November 5, 2021
Complaint: The complainant cannot remember the exact date of this incident but remembers
that the incident took place at
The complainant also provided a case number:
On the night of the incident, a guest at the complainant's hotel was having an issue with the
room they were assigned. As a result, both the guest and a hotel employee called the police.
Once on scene, the complainant alleges that officers were advising the hotel guest how to
proceed. The officers allegedly told the guest to take pictures of the room and report the room
conditions to the hotel's corporate office. While still on the scene, the complainant alleges that
officers failed to de-escalate the situation and threatened to contact someone from court to shut
the hotel down. Later, while the complainant's employee was on the phone with the complainant,
officers allegedly asked the employee who they were on the phone with. More specifically, if
they were speaking to a male or female manager. The complainant thinks that this was uncalled
for and that officers continually treat him, and his wife poorly based on past experiences. On
, the complainant allegedly spoke with an APD sergeant. In this conversation, the
complainant alleges that the sergeant stated that "officers can be opinionated." The complainant
also went to the substation that morning to talk about the incident, but allegedly had to wait 45
minutes before he could speak with anyone. Overall, the complainant is frustrated with APD's
handling of their calls and believes that APD has a personal vendetta against them.
This notice of formal complaint is a request for Internal Affairs to initiate an investigation to
determine if the employee conduct is within compliance of APD policy, Civil Service Rules, and
Municipal Civil Service Rules.
Recommended Administrative Policies to Review (to include but not limited to):
301.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
All persons deserve protection by fair and impartial law enforcement and should be able to
expect similar police response to their behavior wherever it occurs. Employees will serve the
public through direction, counseling, assistance, and protection of life and property. Employees
will be held accountable for the manner in which they exercise the authority of their office or
position. Employees will respect the rights of individuals and perform their services with
honesty, sincerity, courage, and sound judgment.
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to
communications will be provided upon request.
OF
CITY
LOSTER
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
NOTICE OF FORMAL COMPLAINT
301.2 IMPARTIAL ATTITUDE AND COURTESY
Employees shall provide equal and fair protection of all rights under local, state, and federal law
for all members of the community. Law enforcement will be conducted in an impartial and
equitable manner.
In an effort to create an organizational culture that is inclusive and nondiscriminatory, employees
shall act professionally, treat all persons fairly and equally, and strive to interact with the
community in a positive manner. Employees will perform all duties objectively and without
regard to personal feelings, animosities, friendships, financial status, occupation or employment
status, sex, disability status, housing status, mental health or ability, citizenship, language,
national origin, creed, color, race, religion, age, political beliefs, sexual orientation, gender
identity, gender expression, ethnicity, or social or ethnic background. Employees will endeavor
to understand and respect cultural, national, racial, religious, physical, mental, and other
differences.
404.2 POLICY
The Austin Police Department recognizes that a law enforcement presence at a civil dispute can
play an important role in the peace and safety of the community. Subject to available resources,
officers of this department will assist at the scene of civil disputes with the primary goal of
safeguarding persons and property, preventing criminal activity and maintaining the peace.
When handling civil disputes, officers will remain impartial, maintain a calm presence, give
consideration to all sides and refrain from giving legal or inappropriate advice.
437.3.1 CRIMINAL TRESPASS NOTICE
When an officer witnesses a subject being given a trespass notice by an owner/agent, the officer
shall document the incident by either writing a "Criminal Trespass Notice" incident report (title
code 2730) or complete a Criminal Trespass Notice Incident Form (PD0040 or PD0040E). A
subject does not need to be on the property at the time the notice is given in order for the notice
to be valid. If the notice is to be temporary and the suspect leaves when told to do SO by the
owner/agent, the officer will title the report "Assist Complainant" and document that the notice
was temporary and should not be considered a permanent (e.g., up to one year) notice.
Recommended Classification: The OPO is permitted to make a preliminary recommendation on
the classification of administrative cases.
The OPO recommends this complaint receive a B classification.
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to
communications will be provided upon request.